SFPA’s Role in Communicating New Design Values
Originally published by: Southern Forest Products Association — October 13, 2011
The following article was produced and published by the source linked to above, who is solely responsible for its content. SBC Magazine is publishing this story to raise awareness of information publicly available online and does not verify the accuracy of the author’s claims. As a consequence, SBC cannot vouch for the validity of any facts, claims or opinions made in the article.
SFPA issued the following press release outlining it's role in the review of southern pine design values:
The Southern Forest Products Association (SFPA) does not test lumber or establish design values. SFPA is not a lumber rules-writing agency. SFPA’s primary function is to market lumber products and to help users understand Southern Pine grading rules and design values developed by the Southern Pine Inspection Bureau (SPIB) and approved by the American Lumber Standard Committee (ALSC).
“We communicate information provided to us, but we do not have a primary role in the decisions made by SPIB or ALSC,” said SFPA president Adrian Blocker. “SFPA is not responsible for the timing of decisions made with regard to proposed new design values for visually graded dimension lumber; our objective is to make this information available to our customers as quickly as possible and to try to be of assistance to explain what we know,” he added.
Yesterday, the ALSC Board of Review issued a notice stating it will review all information it has received or is furnished involving design values for all species at its October 20, 2011 meeting. SPIB was the first rules-writing agency to submit proposed new design values to ALSC. The National Lumber Grading Authority has submitted its monitoring data to ALSC. All other agencies are immediately undertaking evaluation of their resources and have submitted sampling and testing plans for their species to ALSC. The ALSC Board has asked the U.S. Forest Products Laboratory to conduct a technical review of all species' submittals. The ALSC Board of Review wants to hear from all parties that may be affected by these proposed changes at its upcoming meeting.
“SFPA supports an orderly transition to new design values,” Blocker says. “We understand the deep concerns expressed by end users due to the current lack of a clear and reasonable transition plan with implementation timing guidance. Although SFPA has no control over that process, we will continue to communicate concerns and new information as it becomes available.”