Grenfell Reaction Could Hamper Energy Efficiency Innovations
Originally published by: Building — December 3, 2019
The following article was produced and published by the source linked to above, who is solely responsible for its content. SBC Magazine is publishing this story to raise awareness of information publicly available online and does not verify the accuracy of the author’s claims. As a consequence, SBC cannot vouch for the validity of any facts, claims or opinions made in the article.
The government’s ban on using combustible materials in external walls of high-rise residential towers could stymie the use of innovative products such as photovoltaic panels and green walls, according to a leading designer.
The ban was introduced a year ago in response to the Grenfell disaster in 2017 in which 72 people lost their lives.
But Rob Buck (pictured), façade design associate at Arup, told last month’s Building Live panel debate on façade safety that the current testing regime was limited in scope and failed to consider how a particular product was going to be used.
Buck said he feared the blocking of materials such as photovoltaics “because they use laminated glass within the spandrel panel, and green facades, since they are in effect combustible products”.
He wanted to see a risk-based approach “based on sound fire engineering knowledge.
“And if that means we need to develop more understanding and more testing, then that’s where we should go,” Buck added.
Buck warned the current analysis regime for façades was limited. “The BS 8414 test [which assesses the fire performance of an external cladding system] is tied specifically with rain-screen products and there’s a debate in the industry whether that is applicable.
“I think there is a test that we should be able to employ to allow us to further learn about façades working in fire,” he said.
Another speaker told the gathering in London that government restrictions would lead materials manufacturers to be more innovative.
Russell Curtis, founding director of architect RCKa, said some manufacturers of cross-laminated timber were already looking at non-combustible versions of their product.
“They have to. It’s an existential problem. If you’re a CLT manufacturer you can’t sell your product to anyone who’s building reasonably tall buildings.
“Out of this there will be innovation around façade solutions and materials that will be positive, but it will take time.”